UK services by the Accreditation Committee of the faculty of American Pathologists.

Through the CAP accreditation process, inspectors examine the laboratory’s records and quality control of procedures for the preceding 2 yrs. CAP inspectors examine laboratory personnel qualifications also, equipment, facilities, safety program and record, together with the overall administration of the lab. This stringent inspection system is designed to specifically ensure the best standard of look after all laboratory patients. Managing and President Director, Professor Paul Harkin commented on the achievement ‘This accreditation allows us to further support our clients by running medical diagnostic checks for trial enrichment. That is of increasing importance to your clients and constitutes an important part of our biomarker services’..Though many editors dislike this practice Even, it is frequently used, for a true number of reasons. One can be that in specific fields, authors could be best qualified to suggest suitable reviewers for the manuscript and topic involved. Another is usually that it creates life much easier for editors: finding appropriate peer reviewers who are prepared to review regularly can be both hard and frustrating. A third reason may be that journals and publishers are increasingly multinational. During the past, the editor and editorial panel of a journal knew both scientific field it protected and the people employed in it, but it’s extremely difficult to be sufficiently well linked when both editors and submissions result from all over the world.